Colombia’s Constitutional Court has ruled that both the government and Congress must establish clear rules for the rights and obligations of content creators and influencers. The court stated that rules are necessary to define the responsibilities related to freedom of expression on social media platforms. In a recent ruling, the court urged digital platforms and podcast services to inform Colombian creators about this decision.

The decision came after a legal protection action filed against a podcast creator. The case involved the unauthorized publication of an interview with a woman who had detailed her experience with gender-based violence. She had not given permission for the recording to be used, and she requested its removal multiple times. Despite her requests, the content remained online for over a year. She sought the removal of all associated content, a halt to future publications about her story, economic compensation for the use of her image, and a public apology.

The Constitutional Court reviewed the case and defined the necessary conditions for valid consent. The court stated that consent is a manifestation where a person accepts or refuses a relationship. However, it noted that this consent requires specific conditions to be legally valid. The court established that consent must be obtained before any content is created or a legal relationship is finalized. It must be free of coercion, and the person giving consent must be fully informed about how their image or information will be used.

Related: Income tax dilemma over uncollected rental income

According to the court, if these conditions are not met, the consent is invalid and violates fundamental rights. The court also emphasized that consent is generally revocable. If the original person withdraws their permission, the content creator must take immediate steps to remove the material.

The specific podcast in question required consent that was prior, free, and informed. The recording should have occurred only after authorization was secured. The woman should not have been coerced into the interview, and she must have understood the implications of sharing her personal history.

Protecting personal stories

The court established that using intimate information or a person’s image without proper authorization violates their rights to privacy and personal image. This applies to journalists and influencers alike. The ruling sets a standard for how creators must handle sensitive stories. It forces a shift in how digital interactions are viewed legally. The decision suggests that the digital environment requires stricter boundaries for personal privacy than might currently exist.

Related: Europa busca talento pero falla en integrarlo

This legal precedent forces creators to reconsider their workflows. They must verify permissions before recording, ensuring they are not violating someone’s trust for the sake of content. The ruling also places a burden on platforms to enforce these standards and educate their users on the consequences of non-compliance.

The court’s decision is a significant step towards protecting personal stories.